The Facebook Oversight Board and Trump’s Continued Ban

by | May 5, 2021 | Politics & Corruption

The Facebook Oversight Board and Trump’s Continued Ban

by | May 5, 2021 | Politics & Corruption

The Facebook Oversight Board's decision to continue Trump's ban is well-reasoned and balanced, taking into account public safety as well as making Facebook responsible for following its own rules.

Today Facebook’s Oversight Board (also known as the Supreme Court of Facebook) approved the continued suspension of Donald Trump’s accounts on Facebook and Instagram. This decision was immediately celebrated and correctly made to prevent the future incitement to violence, which Trump has already shown that he has no compunctions toward avoiding.

The decision, once people read it, turned out to be more nuanced in that it also called for Facebook itself to be more forthright about the time span of a suspension period.

The Oversight Board actually went to extraordinary lengths to make their rationale known. Here is the email that I received this morning:

Greetings,  

The Oversight Board has issued its decision regarding former U.S. President Donald Trump’s ‘indefinite suspension’ from Facebook and Instagram following the events of January 6, 2021.  

You can read the full case decision here

The Oversight Board found that the suspension of Mr. Trump was necessary to protect public safety. However, the Board rejected Facebook’s ‘indefinite suspension’. Facebook failed to apply its normal rules on accounts that severely violate its content policies. Instead, it invented a vague and arbitrary penalty which gave Facebook total discretion on when to impose and lift the suspension. Anyone concerned about Facebook’s power should be concerned with the company making decisions outside of its own rules.  

The Board has given Facebook a maximum of six months in which to either permanently disable Trump’s account or impose a new suspension for a specific period of time. Amongst several recommendations in the decision, the Board proposes that in the future if a head of state or high government official repeatedly posts messages that pose a risk of harm, Facebook should suspend the account for a specific period sufficient to protect against imminent harm and to deter misconduct and may, if appropriate, delete the account. 

If Facebook opts to impose another suspension they must assess whether restoring Mr. Trump’s access is likely to lead to harm. Mr. Trump will remain suspended until Facebook has reexamined the penalty. 

The Oversight Board’s decision safeguards freedom of speech while ensuring that Facebook creates clear, consistent and transparent rules regarding account penalties and restrictions.  

Finally, with over 9,000 public comments submitted from around the world, we want to sincerely thank you for all your input into this case. We hope that you continue to remain engaged in the work of the Board! 

If you would like to learn more about the decision, we encourage you to join the Aspen Institute’s panel discussion at 11:00am EDT. Register here

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to reach out.  

Sincerely, 

​​​​The Oversight Board Engagement Team 

Various media accounts have rather shamefully sensationalized this decision by making it sound like it was still possible for Trump to get his social media megaphone back in future.

The Oversight Board’s decision is well-reasoned and balanced, taking into account public safety as well as making Facebook responsible for following its own rules. The sensationalism being applied to this by media outlets is highly irresponsible and frankly is what created the problem of Trump in the first place.

Let’s be honest, Trump was able to dominate the media landscape for years by being an outright and outrageous liar. The man is pure click bait. Media outlets, with the migration of news from print to pixels, became addicted to the clicks Trump could generate. And that addiction was a drug that was impossible to withdraw from. And like all addictions there is a price. Only this time the price was actual human lives. Trump’s reign cost more American lives than almost all the wars we fought combined. And then there was the attempted coup.

He should never be allowed back on any media platform at all and the world would benefit from that immensely.

Just as the profits of weapons of war and the profits of addictive drugs are blood money, so are the profits of advertising generated by promoting a death monger like Trump. Forever may he be banned.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Related Articles

Jan 25 2023

Election Denial Has Been a Lucrative Business for Kari Lake

Kari Lake raised over $2.5 million after her election loss, but less than 10% of her post-election spending went to lawyers.
Jan 24 2023

New Brett Kavanaugh Documentary Hopes to Spark a Full Investigation

A surprise documentary about Brett Kavanaugh reveals disturbing new evidence of misconduct by Kavanaugh and his associates surrounding the right-wing justice’s...
Catherine Engelbrecht, center, founder of True the Vote, and Gregg Phillips, right, at a news conference in Las Vegas Credit: Bridget Bennett/Reuters
Jan 24 2023

Election Deniers True the Vote Sought Funds for an Abandoned Hospital Project in Ukraine

True the Vote, a group that spread discredited election conspiracy theories, “abandoned” The Freedom Hospital in April 2022, according to its lawyers. Yet board member...
Jan 17 2023

Republicans Focus on Gutting Medicare and Social Security

Republicans plan to destroy Medicare and Social Security because their fondest wish is to protect the wealth of the rich. Thus they are prepared to ignore the...
Jan 17 2023

Medicare Advantage Is Nothing but a Money-Making Scam. I Should Know. I Helped to Sell It.

I am a former health-care executive who helped develop PR and marketing schemes to sell private Medicare Advantage insurance plans.
Jan 16 2023

New York Voters Might Be Stuck With Liar George Santos Until 2024

While forty states provide for the recall of state and local elected officials, there is no federal recall law that could lead to the removal of someone like Santos...
Jan 11 2023

The 5 Types of Generality Threats Used to Create Division and Violence

A researcher has isolated five types of threat utilizing the speech generalities of “us” and “them” and how they are used to divide societies...
Jan 11 2023

How Social Media Giants Directly Aided the Fascist Insurrection in Brazil

Meta and other major social media companies had ignored or brushed off warnings that their platforms were being used as crucial organizing hubs for Brazil’s...
Jan 10 2023

How the Recently Signed $1.7 Trillion Spending Bill Quietly Cracked a Massive Tax Scam

A highly abused tax loophole, exploited for billions in tax avoidance, was closed by a provision the year-ending $1.7 trillion spending bill. Of course the companies...
Jan 07 2023

McCarthy Finally Elected Speaker After Selling His Soul to the Sedition Caucus

It is a bitter irony that on the second anniversary of the Insurrection, McCarthy finally made enough concessions to become Speaker to the very people who participated...
Subscribe for Updates!

Subscribe for Updates!

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This