The Facebook Oversight Board and Trump’s Continued Ban

by | May 5, 2021 | Politics & Corruption

The Facebook Oversight Board and Trump’s Continued Ban

by | May 5, 2021 | Politics & Corruption

The Facebook Oversight Board's decision to continue Trump's ban is well-reasoned and balanced, taking into account public safety as well as making Facebook responsible for following its own rules.

Today Facebook’s Oversight Board (also known as the Supreme Court of Facebook) approved the continued suspension of Donald Trump’s accounts on Facebook and Instagram. This decision was immediately celebrated and correctly made to prevent the future incitement to violence, which Trump has already shown that he has no compunctions toward avoiding.

The decision, once people read it, turned out to be more nuanced in that it also called for Facebook itself to be more forthright about the time span of a suspension period.

The Oversight Board actually went to extraordinary lengths to make their rationale known. Here is the email that I received this morning:


The Oversight Board has issued its decision regarding former U.S. President Donald Trump’s ‘indefinite suspension’ from Facebook and Instagram following the events of January 6, 2021.  

You can read the full case decision here

The Oversight Board found that the suspension of Mr. Trump was necessary to protect public safety. However, the Board rejected Facebook’s ‘indefinite suspension’. Facebook failed to apply its normal rules on accounts that severely violate its content policies. Instead, it invented a vague and arbitrary penalty which gave Facebook total discretion on when to impose and lift the suspension. Anyone concerned about Facebook’s power should be concerned with the company making decisions outside of its own rules.  

The Board has given Facebook a maximum of six months in which to either permanently disable Trump’s account or impose a new suspension for a specific period of time. Amongst several recommendations in the decision, the Board proposes that in the future if a head of state or high government official repeatedly posts messages that pose a risk of harm, Facebook should suspend the account for a specific period sufficient to protect against imminent harm and to deter misconduct and may, if appropriate, delete the account. 

If Facebook opts to impose another suspension they must assess whether restoring Mr. Trump’s access is likely to lead to harm. Mr. Trump will remain suspended until Facebook has reexamined the penalty. 

The Oversight Board’s decision safeguards freedom of speech while ensuring that Facebook creates clear, consistent and transparent rules regarding account penalties and restrictions.  

Finally, with over 9,000 public comments submitted from around the world, we want to sincerely thank you for all your input into this case. We hope that you continue to remain engaged in the work of the Board! 

If you would like to learn more about the decision, we encourage you to join the Aspen Institute’s panel discussion at 11:00am EDT. Register here

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to reach out.  


​​​​The Oversight Board Engagement Team 

Various media accounts have rather shamefully sensationalized this decision by making it sound like it was still possible for Trump to get his social media megaphone back in future.

The Oversight Board’s decision is well-reasoned and balanced, taking into account public safety as well as making Facebook responsible for following its own rules. The sensationalism being applied to this by media outlets is highly irresponsible and frankly is what created the problem of Trump in the first place.

Let’s be honest, Trump was able to dominate the media landscape for years by being an outright and outrageous liar. The man is pure click bait. Media outlets, with the migration of news from print to pixels, became addicted to the clicks Trump could generate. And that addiction was a drug that was impossible to withdraw from. And like all addictions there is a price. Only this time the price was actual human lives. Trump’s reign cost more American lives than almost all the wars we fought combined. And then there was the attempted coup.

He should never be allowed back on any media platform at all and the world would benefit from that immensely.

Just as the profits of weapons of war and the profits of addictive drugs are blood money, so are the profits of advertising generated by promoting a death monger like Trump. Forever may he be banned.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Related Articles

Oct 05 2022

Voting Rights Are First Up on the Docket at the Supreme Court

Black voters make up more than a quarter of the Alabama’s population, but only one congressional district would be majority Black under the voting map drawn by...
Oct 04 2022

Big Pharma-Funded FDA Gets Drugs Out Faster, but at What Cost?

In 1992 Congress passed a law committing the drug industry to pay so-called user fees to help fund the FDA’s drug approval process. Big Pharma has used that law to...
Sep 26 2022

The Koch Network Is Financing Election Deniers With Campaign Cash Ahead of Midterms

Charles Koch and his billionaire buddies in the Koch Network continue their pattern of trying to tear down our government by funding candidates who tried to turn our...
Sep 25 2022

How the Supreme Court Unleashed a Corporate Criminal Takeover of America

Because of key decisions by the Supreme Court equating money with free speech, our political system is now overrun with grifters, con artists and career...
Sep 22 2022

New York’s Lawsuit Against Donald Trump — A Tax Lawyer Explains What’s at Stake

While the New York Attorney General’s massive lawsuit against Donald Trump, his children and companies is a civil suit, it marks a beginning and an acceleration...
Sep 21 2022

How Privatization and Corruption Magnified Puerto Rico’s Vulnerability to Hurricanes

Still recovering from the 2017 disaster of Hurricane Maria, which killed 3000 Americans in Puerto Rico, the islands have been blacked again out by much smaller...
Sep 17 2022

What Is Behind the Diminishing Trust in Government Institutions?

Our government institutions are the glue that actually holds our society together and keep things rolling. What happens when that glue stops sticking?
Sep 15 2022

The Sacklers and Purdue Pharma Were Not Alone in Creating and Profiting From the Opioid Crisis

The Sacklers became the public face of the opioid crisis despite not being the only players. They were the first to hypermarket opioids and then led the pack in blaming...
U.S. Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) speaks during an April 6, 2022 press conference at the U.S. Capitol. Gottheimer is among the nearly 100 members of U.S. Congress whose ownership or trading of financial assets overlapped with their committee work. (Photo: Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Sep 14 2022

Conflict of Interest: Members of Congress Trading Stocks

We need more action on legislation that would ban Congressional stock trading. And fewer members of Congress in violation of the rules already on the books.
Sep 13 2022

The Tax Money Sinkhole That Is the American Weapons Industry

Military contractors and arms manufacturers and other weapons industry players cash in as Congress adds billions to the Pentagon budget each year.
Subscribe for Updates!

Subscribe for Updates!

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This