Could the Challenge to Madison Cawthorn’s Qualifications Be a Template for Removing Insurrectionists From Congress?

by | Jan 11, 2022 | Progress & Solutions, Opinions

Rep. Madison Cawthorn, R-N.C., at the U.S. Capitol, Jan. 7, 2021. (House Television via AP, File)

Could the Challenge to Madison Cawthorn’s Qualifications Be a Template for Removing Insurrectionists From Congress?

by | Jan 11, 2022 | Progress & Solutions, Opinions

Rep. Madison Cawthorn, R-N.C., at the U.S. Capitol, Jan. 7, 2021. (House Television via AP, File)
Madison Cawthorn's re-election may be over before it starts. His very qualifications to run have been challenged by a group of voters in his home state.

As reported by AP and scores of other outlets, a group of North Carolina voters urged state officials Monday to disqualify U.S. Rep. Madison Cawthorn as a congressional candidate, citing his participation in a rally last January in Washington that questioned the presidential election outcome and preceded the Capitol riot.

The core of their challenge is Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

The challenge was backed by a group called Free Speech for People, a national election and campaign finance reform group. “The importance of defending the bedrock constitutional principle that oath breakers who engage in insurrection cannot be trusted in future office is essential to maintain,” said the group’s legal director, Ron Fein.

The ball is now in Cawthorn’s lap. North Carolina State law says Cawthorn has the burden to “show by a preponderance of the evidence” that he’s qualified to run.

This is a unique and enlightening move on the part of these voters.

We are a representative government. The power possessed by the government is based on the consent of the governed. That’s our model. The living document of our Constitution lays out how this works. And the various Amendments show how it has evolved over the centuries that it has endured thus far.

The 14th Amendment is explicit in establishing a qualification for office holders of not operating in a manner contrary to their oaths of office, a violation clearly demonstrated by Cawthorn and more than a few others. In spite of the existence of Section 3 of the 14th, historically no Members of Congress have been removed on the grounds it presents.

Only five members of the House have ever been expelled and only fifteen from the Senate. To now see a group of voters attempt to prevent a seditionist sitting member of the House from running for re-election is a new and frankly refreshing move.

For many Americans the idea of politics is more than a little distasteful. This is possibly because Civics and the basics of our government system used to be a standard element of our education system but were long ago replaced with “social studies.”

The election of Donald Trump to the Office of President was a wake-up call to a growing number of Americans to at least get a primer on how our system is supposed to work. And lo! and behold, even a cursory study tells one that we, the voters, are actually in charge. It is our consent that is the very foundation of our system. And thus it is no surprise that Trump-corrupted Republicans are working hard to reduce the numbers of us that may vote.

So when we have voters band together and make the case that a candidate or office holder is too odious to even consider, based on that person’s treasonous actions, well that is saying something. Loudly.

Those that want to destroy our country by turning it into a white supremacist quasi-religious fanatic form of government—people like Michael Flynn, Steve Bannon and others—are doing so at a grassroots level. They are attempting to take over school boards, city councils or other civic groups largely by coercion and intimidation, but by at least paying attention to how things work at a local level.

Thus, voters working at a local level to nullify the candidacy of seditionists, insurrectionists and white supremacists is actually quite appropriate and should be applauded. Loudly.

1 Comment

  1. Steve Soffer

    The law is on the books… Congress and the Justice Department must enforce it. PERIOD. END OF STORY.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Related Articles

May 16 2022

Unfortunately Trees Are Not the Climate Change Cure-All We’ve Assumed They Would Be

Two studies show it is not a great idea to count on forests as a widespread carbon solution for climate change through the 21st century, particularly if societies don’t...
May 13 2022

Rick Scott — Florida Man Gaslights Himself

Rick Scott has published an 11-point proposal to raise taxes on the poorest of Americans and set the stage to destroy Medicare and Social Security. But he now claims it...
May 13 2022

Bernie Sanders Unveils Medicare for All Act of 2022

A study by RAND found that moving to a Medicare for All system would save a family with an income of less than $185,000 about $3,000 a year, on average.
May 12 2022

Tucker Carlson’s Fake Masculinity Crisis Is a Fascist History Lesson

Tucker Carlson is pulling from an old playbook as he stokes anxiety about a masculinity crisis that doesn’t actually exist.
May 09 2022

A Nonprofit Drugmaker Is Taking Aim at Insulin Price Gouging

Civica Rx, a nonprofit that manufactures generic drugs, is trying to help solve the problem of rampant insulin price gouging and profiteering by major drug...
May 07 2022

Turning Back the Clock: Justice Alito’s Leaked Draft Overturning Roe v. Wade Quotes a Witch Trial Judge

Justice Alito’s leaked opinion cites Sir Matthew Hale, a 17th-century jurist who conceived the notion that husbands can’t be prosecuted for raping their wives, who...
May 05 2022

Could Roe v. Wade Be Made Into Codified Law By Congress?

If the Supreme Court does strike down Roe v. Wade, it will be the first time the Supreme Court would be setting a precedent to take away a constitutional right from...
May 05 2022

Roe v. Wade: Nothing Is More Personal Than the Right to Control Your Own Body

Roe v. Wade doesn’t just protect abortion rights. It’s the keystone that keeps politicians out of the most intimate aspects of our lives.
May 04 2022

The Supreme Court Versus Roe v. Wade — A Digest of What’s at Stake

The leaked draft of the Supreme Court’s repudiation of Roe v. Wade has caused an explosion of anger from a wide majority and cheers from right wing religious...
May 02 2022

The Right’s Definition of Manhood Is Toxic

For a long time now, the “boys will be boys” apologists on the Right use their boardrooms and their pulpit and their platforms to tell us that this is what manhood...
Subscribe for Updates!

Subscribe for Updates!

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This