An investigation by Documented and the New York Times has revealed a coordinated effort by state officials to oppose climate policy. Key to this campaign is the State Financial Officers’ Foundation (SFOF), a 501c(3) non-profit political advocacy organization made up of state treasurers, financial officials, and Republican political operatives. Over the last year, the group has emerged as an crucial node of opposition to climate action in the financial industry, specifically attempts to require companies to disclose information on their climate and societal impact—commonly shorthanded as environment, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure.
This campaign has seen significant success, including legislation against climate measures in multiple states and the divestment of millions of dollars of state funds from investment management companies that SFOF claims are too “woke.” SFOF is currently pushing state treasurers to oppose federal climate policies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules on ESG disclosure.
SFOF’s advocacy is closely tied to a web of climate science denying political groups, including ALEC, The Heritage Foundation, Consumers’ Research, National Center for Public Policy Research, and Capital Research Center. These groups either sponsor SFOF, sit on SFOF’s leadership board, or both—giving them significant sway over SFOF’s strategic direction. These groups, as well as groups formally aligned with the fossil fuel industry, such as the American Petroleum Institute, benefit from SFOF’s anti-climate action work.
Documents also reveal how SFOF’s policy advocacy is steered by corporate sponsors like Federated Hermes, whose public profile on climate is diametrically opposed to SFOF’s pro-fossil fuel campaigning. These sponsors, which include major investment management firms in competition with BlackRock, gain direct access to elected officials that oversee vast state funds. They also guide the policy advocacy of SFOF’s members, even editing official comments to rules sent from treasurers’ offices.
“During SFOF national meetings, our sponsors aren’t sitting in the back room observing…they are working along side our state officials” SFOF Promotional Material
SFOF Is Closely Tied to and Funded By a Constellation of Anti-Climate Groups.
SFOF’s leadership includes top staff from both ALEC and the Heritage Foundation. Lisa Nelson, the president of ALEC, sits on the Board of Directors. SFOF often holds meetings in conjunction with ALEC. Nelson is also a director of the National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR), a group allied with SFOF in attacking climate finance. NCPPR presented at SFOF’S February, 2022 policy meeting focused on opposing climate measures.
Jonathan Williams serves as SFOF’s Senior Policy Advisor and as ALEC’s Chief Economist and Executive Vice President of Policy. Williams joined SFOF’s National Advisory Committee in June 2017 and seems to be focused on climate policy in the financial industry for ALEC. Multiple current SFOF members are ALEC alumni including Kentucky State Auditor Mike Harmon, Wyoming Treasurer Curt Meier and Missouri Treasurer Scott Fitzpatrick.
The Vice President of the Heritage Foundation, Bridgett Wagner, also sits on the SFOF board. As the Center for Media and Democracy reported, attendee lists from SFOF’s national meetings show a hodgepodge of corporate sponsors, elected officials, and Republican political groups.
SFOF is also funded by the dark-money funded group Consumers’ Research, which has been at the forefront of the campaign against BlackRock, climate initiatives, and shareholder activism aimed at lowering greenhouse gas pollution. SFOF’s turn toward anti-climate finance campaigning coincides with Consumers’ Research becoming one of SFOF’s top sponsors. Consumers’ Research was listed as a “Diamond” level sponsor for the first time at the November 2021 SFOF policy meeting, where Consumers’ Research Executive Director Will Hild presented on “BlackRock/China discussion.” It was the first SFOF meeting with specifically anti-climate discussion topics, which included “The Continuing “ESG” and “Wokeism” Attack on Economic Freedom,” presented by SFOF’s President, Derek Kreifels. Consumers’ Research remains a “Diamond level” sponsor of SFOF in 2022.
Republican activist and one-time Trump Secretary of Labor nominee Andy Puzder sits on SFOF’s board of advisors. Puzder, alongside fellow “thought-leader” Vivek Ramaswamy, have led discussions on opposing climate measures during SFOF meetings. Both Puzder and Ramaswamy have started “anti-woke” asset management firms that hope to replace BlackRock and other asset managers targeted for boycott by SFOF member treasurers.
SFOF also has ties to the fossil fuel industry they seek to defend. The American Petroleum Institute, the largest oil lobbying group in the U.S, held a call on “the SEC Climate Rule proposal” with SFOF and member treasurers in May 2022. In June 2022, an SFOF “Policy Alert” prominently featured API logos and a list of policy asks by the oil industry. API also communicates directly with SFOF member treasurers, arming them with talking points on climate policy. In one email from April 2022, API Director Gifford Briggs passed information on BlackRock to Treasurer Marlo Oaks of Utah. “I also included some info on BlackRock, it seems they are trying to reaffirm their support for industry…” Briggs wrote.
You can find a visual of SFOF’s ties to these anti-climate and dark money groups here.
On April 6, 2022 Gulf Coast Regional Director of the American Petroleum Institute Gifford Briggs emailed Utah Treasurer Marlo Oaks information on the energy industry, key messaging as well as “some info on Blackrock.”
SFOF Is Central to a Unified Strategy Against Climate Policies.
SFOF’s anti-climate advocacy is part of a coordinated effort by a web of right-wing groups to block climate action. SFOF plays a unique role in this larger campaign by weaponizing state treasurers’ offices to advance an anti-climate agenda. Heritage Foundation Vice President Andrew Olivastro alluded to this unity in a December 2021 email to SFOF staffers and member treasurers. “We continue to develop our strategy and unify in pushing back against the various issues surrounding ESG,” he wrote.
Led by a core group of political operatives, this campaign seeks to utilize treasurers’ authority to attack climate policy in novel ways. As West Virginia Treasurer Riley Moore wrote in an email to fellow SFOF member Treasurer Schroeder from Louisiana, “As state treasurers we are in a unique position to exact real pressure” on the Biden Administration and asset managers that ”comply with draconian efforts of the administration.” In an SFOF podcast in 2022, Moore expounded on the ways treasurers are in a singular position to defend the fossil fuel industry and in turn, why SFOF’s strategy is so effective within this larger anti-climate campaign.
Well, state treasurers are actually a very unique position… we’re able to kind of speak with the taxpayer dollars is what I’d say. And you can do that in a way that’s uniquely different than, say, attorney generals do, where they might sue over certain issue or something like that. This has more of an immediate effect…I think that’s why it’s somewhat uniquely different in some of the other what we call here constitutional officers, attorney general or secretary of state or something like that. So I think it’s a great opportunity for all state treasurers to really start to weigh in on this new battlefront. [00:17:41][59.8]
State treasurers’ relevance to climate change has been boosted by the current state of federal climate policy. Until the recent introduction of the Inflation Reduction Act on July 27, 2022, federal climate legislation has either stalled or failed, and EPA regulations to address climate pollution have been hamstrung and limited by the courts. This has left financial industry regulation and corporate policy, set by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and individual asset managers respectively, as one of the most impactful climate policy actions underway in the United States.
SFOF member treasurers recognize this, as Idaho Treasurer Julie Ellsworth alluded to in a hearing on ESG, featuring SFOF president Derek Kreifels. “We realized the financial regulatory process has expressly been saying that they are going to implement these environmental green new deal type things through the treasury,” she said.
SFOF supports and coordinates attacks on climate policy in a variety of ways, including:
Timeline of SFOF Anti-Climate Advocacy.
SFOF’s work has shifted dramatically over the last year and a half. In years past, the group was primarily concerned with traditional fiscal issues like financial literacy and unclaimed property. However, by the end of 2021, three out of four of SFOF’s priority issue areas were focused on opposing climate policies and advocating for the fossil fuel industry.
A timeline of events, from 2021 to 2022, shows how SFOF’s tactics have evolved overtime and how the organization has shifted towards more aggressive policy advocacy generally.
2021
2022
During an ESG Roundtable hosted by Idaho Treasurer Ellsworth and featuring Derek Kreifels of SFOF, Vivek Ramaswamy, Utah Treasurer Oaks and Idaho Senator Crapo, Senator Crapo attacks the SEC rule, describing it as a needless overstep by the agency and an example of how “unelected bureaucrats in this administration are now implementing their preferred agenda through regulation.”
SFOF Gives Sponsors Private Access to Elected Financial Officials. These Sponsors Guide SFOF Policy.
At SFOF meetings, treasurers are promised a “very friendly audience” with “various corporate sponsors.” Sponsors, in turn, get direct private access to elected officials. Promotional materials make it clear that national meetings are built on granting sponsors a hand in guiding the group. “During SFOF national meetings, our sponsors aren’t sitting in the back room observing…they are working along side our state officials” reads one SFOF brochure. National meetings boast of “intimate” dinners with corporate sponsors. Sponsors are promised one-on-one time with state treasurers to make presentations.
Indeed, SFOF sponsors are not limited to dining and chatting with elected officials. Documents make clear that sponsors can set the group’s course on policy issues, and even edit official letters sent by the treasurers. In one case, sponsors Visa and Mastercard brought up a proposed Federal Reserve regulation to SFOF, an issue seemingly not on the group’s radar. Visa and Mastercard were then able to directly edit official comments on a Federal Reserve docket signed by multiple states’ officials. The final submission made no mention of the corporations’ role in editing the treasurers’ comments.
Anti-climate sponsors of SFOF had a prominent role in discussions around climate policy within the financial industry. Will Hild of Consumers’ Research was included on the agenda for SFOF’s November 3, 2021, policy meeting to discuss “BlackRock/China.” NCPPR’s Scott Shepard joined SFOF’s May 2, 2022, national call, where he shared insight on proxy voting and shareholder proposals.
Some Sponsors Have ESG Commitments That Conflict Directly With SFOF Advocacy.
SFOF’s campaign against climate policy clashes directly with the public ESG policies of some of their largest donors. For example, Federated Hermes, a financial services firm, is a major sponsor of SFOF meetings. Federated Hermes officials dined with West Virginia Treasurer Riley Moore in what SFOF describes as an “intimate dinner party.” SFOF emails make clear that Federated Hermes specifically sought Moore as a dining companion. However, Moore’s attacks on climate finance policy and ESG clash with Federated Hermes’ outspoken support for climate focused investing, and the company’s leadership position in the Climate Action 100+. Federated Investors, a precursor to the current company, has supported SFOF since at least 2016, when Hermes’ Amy Michaliszyn won an Economic Freedom Award from SFOF.
Federated Hermes has continued to sponsor SFOF and attend SFOF meetings even as SFOF has staked out more extreme positions on climate and climate finance issues. Federated Hermes was a “platinum” sponsor of SFOF’s July 2021 meeting, where Riley Moore presented the “Fossil Fuel Letter” sent to John Kerry. Hermes was a “gold” sponsor of the February 2022 meeting in New Orleans, which was overwhelmingly focused on attacking ESG measures. They are currently listed as a 2022 “gold” sponsor.
Republished with permission from Documented.
Documented
Documented is an investigative watchdog and journalism project committed to holding the powerful interests that undermine our democracy accountable.
We believe that hard-hitting, investigative journalism is needed now more than ever.
Corporations and wealthy donors have far too much power and influence in our political and justice systems. Profits and shareholders are too often put ahead of everyday people. The very real and urgent dangers of climate change are being downplayed or ignored. Our democracy itself is under attack.
