The Suppression of Voting Rights Is a Direct Attack on Civil Rights

by | Feb 4, 2022 | Human Rights & Justice

Photo by Unseen Histories

The Suppression of Voting Rights Is a Direct Attack on Civil Rights

by | Feb 4, 2022 | Human Rights & Justice

Photo by Unseen Histories

The suppression of voting rights is nothing more than an effort to turn back the clock on the American civil rights movement.

Republished with permission from The Conversation, by Anthony Siracusa, University of Colorado Boulder

With Congress failing to pass new voting rights legislation, it’s worth remembering that throughout U.S. history, new civil rights laws designed to end racial inequities across American life have been met by stubborn resistance.

Senate Democrats Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona joined Senate Republicans in blocking both the Freedom to Vote Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. These bills would have combated voter suppression by creating a national automatic voter registration system, and they also would have banned partisan gerrymandering.

In the wake of the vote, President Joe Biden said he was “profoundly disappointed that the United States Senate has failed to stand up for democracy.”

Protesters demonstrate on June 2, 2020, during a Black Lives Matter protest in New York City. Johannes Eisele/AFP via Getty Images

These setbacks in Congress come on the heels of millions of Americans calling for change.

The demonstrations that followed George Floyd’s death in 2020 belonged to a broader effort to reckon with white violence and discrimination in U.S. life.

The historical roots of the nation’s contemporary racial injustice were documented in the 1619 Project, a New York Times undertaking in 2019 that reexamined the legacy of slavery in the U.S. In 2021, widespread commemoration of the Tulsa Race Massacre of 1921 also contributed to this moment of racial reckoning.

As a total of 28 states are now considering or have enacted legislation to limit the teaching of this painful history, I’d argue that this is a moment to dig more deeply into our nation’s past.

As a scholar of African American history, I believe that revisiting American history can uncover the roots of the current national challenges — from what children learn in school to how Americans are treated as they drive a car — and help us chart a better path forward.

Legacy of Violence and Discrimination

The belief in white supremacy that has endured for centuries in America was made plain in the 1852 Supreme Court ruling Dred Scott v. Sandford, which determined that Black Americans were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court.

Following the Civil War, a Republican Congress seemed to make progress for American civil rights with the passage of the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery. Congress attempted to guarantee equal protection under the law for all Americans with the 14th Amendment.
​
And Congress passed the 15th Amendment, which gave all men the right to vote, regardless of race.

Additionally, Congress passed two Civil Rights Acts in 1866 and 1875. These laws and amendments, passed during the period of Reconstruction, were intended to provide the full benefits of citizenship for African Americans, including voting and equal legal protection.

But the legacy of Dred Scott endured.

In 1883, the Supreme Court struck down the Civil Rights Acts in a series of decisions and opened the way for public and private entities to refuse service and accommodation to Black Americans. These decisions were the precursor to the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision that made “separate but equal” the law of the land, legalizing segregation.

The Plessy decision was not simply about relegating Black Americans to separate water fountains and toilets. It invalidated Black Americans’ equal protection under the law, a move that subjected African American communities to horrific consequences.

Members of the NAACP hold signs during a protest in Washington in 1934 against the practice of lynching. International News Photos/Library of Congress/Corbis/VCG via Getty Images

The ruling resulted in a major setback for racial equality. Between 1877 and 1945, more than 4,400 Black Americans were lynched without a trial.

In the summer of 1919, what’s known as the “Red Summer,” the blood of Black Americans flowed in the streets of American cities as Black people and their property endured violent assault, with no protection from the law.

This white mob violence was a response to African Americans seeking wartime jobs in Northern and Midwestern cities during the Great Migration. That’s when millions of African Americans moved from the Southern countryside to urban areas nationwide, escaping horrific discrimination, lynchings and the terror of the Ku Klux Klan.

During World War II, white and Black Americans battled Nazi racism in segregated units. But a budding freedom movement at home finally began to secure legal victories before the Supreme Court.

In 1944, the court’s Smith v. Allwright decision ended the exclusionary “white primary” that had prevented Black Americans from voting across the South. And the high court made segregation in schools illegal in 1954’s Brown v. Topeka Board of Education.

Retrenchment and Resistance

Yet the Allwright ruling was not enforced, and Black Americans still could not vote across the South.

And the Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown was met with “massive resistance” by lawmakers, ultimately requiring a second Supreme Court decision — Brown II — and an act of Congress — the Civil Rights Act of 1964 — to end lawful segregation in the United States.

In 2013, the Supreme Court removed the heart of the Voting Rights Act, allowing nine states with a history of race-based voting restrictions to change their election laws without prior federal approval.

In 2020, 60 years after the Brown decision, the Economic Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank, reported that Black youth are twice as likely to attend segregated, high-poverty schools as their white counterparts.

And in July 2021, the court upheld an Arizona law that disqualifies ballots of those who vote in the wrong precinct — a decision that challengers say will make it harder for minority populations to vote.

Home ownership remained a problem. Despite the Fair Housing Act of 1968, Black Americans were victims of systemic predatory mortgage lending in the years leading up to the 2008 financial crisis. Minority homeowners were overcharged for mortgage fees and subjected to long-term financial risks, such as monthly payments that get more expensive over time.

These practices created significantly lower levels of home ownership and home equity in Black communities.

As yet, no law has created the equality enshrined in the nation’s founding documents.

Indeed, the challenging lesson from our nation’s history is that a deep well of strength and resilience is required for the long struggle to make equity and equality under the law a reality in the United States.

This is an updated version of an article originally published on August 13, 2021.The Conversation

The Conversation

The Conversation

The Conversation is a nonprofit, independent news organization dedicated to unlocking the knowledge of experts for the public good. We publish trustworthy and informative articles written by academic experts for the general public and edited by our team of journalists.

Help Support Factkeepers!

Follow Us

Popular Articles

Subscribe for Updates!

Subscribe for Updates!

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Share This