The Supreme Court’s Overturn of Roe v. Wade Turns Back the Clock on Democracy Itself

by | Jun 25, 2022 | Opinions & Commentary, Human Rights & Justice

"My Right My Decision" rally United States Supreme Court Photo: Salud Carbajal, Wiki Commons

The Supreme Court’s Overturn of Roe v. Wade Turns Back the Clock on Democracy Itself

by | Jun 25, 2022 | Opinions & Commentary, Human Rights & Justice

"My Right My Decision" rally United States Supreme Court Photo: Salud Carbajal, Wiki Commons
It’s not a ‘democracy’ when minority-elected presidents nominate Supreme Court justices who overturn constitutional protections and give state governments the power to do more of the same.

Many Americans may find it increasingly difficult to convince their international peers that the U.S. is truly a representative democracy.

A president who lost the popular vote (twice) nominated three conservative Supreme Court justices. Another president who lost the popular vote in his first term nominated two.

Now, these justices have overturned Roe v. Wade, despite Roe enjoying the support of 70% of Americans, according to the Pew Research Center.

But Justice Alito’s opinion makes no claim that conservative justices are trying to appease the American majority. Rather, his draft claims that overturning Roe will be more democratic, that doing so will empower states to decide abortion law for themselves.

But can state governments be trusted to play fair?

State Governments Are Disinterested in Representing Their Constituents

Of the 26 states set to outlaw or severely restrict abortion access now that Roe v. Wade is overturned, Pew reports that the states where a majority or plurality of residents want abortion to remain legal are as follows:

  • Arizona: 49% pro-choice vs. 46% anti-choice
  • Florida: 56% vs. 39%
  • Iowa: 52% vs. 46%
  • Michigan: 54%  vs. 42%
  • Montana: 56% vs. 38%
  • Nebraska: 50% vs. 46%
  • Ohio: 48% vs. 47%
  • Oklahoma: 51% vs. 45%
  • Wisconsin: 53% vs. 45%

One-third of the state governments set to severely restrict or ban abortion represent populations where more residents want abortion to remain legal than don’t.

These nine state governments (who represent a combined population of some 67.6 million Americans) are failing their constituents. By their own actions, they’re making the case for why crucial human rights like a woman’s right to choose an abortion must remain under Constitutional protection.

Beyond the unwillingness of state governments to accurately represent their constituents, there’s a history lesson to remind us why abortion rights are for all women of a free nation, not just some of them.

As one historian put it, “Issues of individual rights bearing such heavy moral weight (as abortion) cannot be contained within state boundaries. ‘Let’s leave it up to the states’ will quickly become: ‘We expect other states to comply with our laws and will demand federal action to guarantee it.’”

That historian is drawing a lesson from the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which aimed to mollify southern states in their growing frustration that northern states refused to cooperate with the South’s slave laws.

The Act provided the legal framework for slave-holding states to demand that free states in the North return runaway slaves.

Back then, the existence of slavery anywhere meant the protection of it everywhere.

How long before similar conflicts arise around abortion access? Missouri legislators have already proposed a law that would allow private citizens to sue anyone who helps a Missouri resident have an abortion, even if that aid was provided outside Missouri’s borders.

From the person who drives a Missouri woman to an out-of-state abortion clinic to the doctor at that clinic, no one would be safe from Missouri legislators’ wild notion that their laws apply not just in Missouri, but in every state Missouri residents travel to.

Beyond the moral hypocrisy of Missouri state legislators (who proclaim to respect states’ rights) trying to enforce their laws on residents of other states, their proposal bears painful resemblance to the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850.

And while many Americans might not recall the Slave Act and the political, ideological, and often bloody fallout it created, every American certainly knows what happened 11 years later when the South felt it could no longer use political action alone to force its slave society upon the rest of the nation.

Alito’s Opinion Drives Us Further From a Resolution

Federalism, our chosen form of government in which some powers are held federally and some by the states, is a robust system that allows states to function as partially independent units.

This system works (more or less), but it only works when the republic guarantees basic rights to all citizens.

To allow broadly unaccountable institutions on the state and judicial level to impose severe limitations on what human rights are respected in which states is not only highly undemocratic, it flirts with a return to the same kind of state-to-state infighting and ideological bloodletting that brought the nation to its knees in 1861.

This is not a road we wish to travel again.

Republished with permission from the author. First published in the Tennessean.

Ren Brabenec

Ren Brabenec

Ren Brabenec is a writer, activist, and Planned Parenthood volunteer residing in Nashville, Tennessee.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Related Articles

Feb 04 2023

Fear, Terror and Paranoia: Understanding the Mindset of the Far-Right

The paranoia-terror coffee klatch of the far-right thinks every random thought is a “fact.” And by this they tip their hand as to their real mindset—they...
grayscale photography of a man standing in front of a Jesus graffiti
Feb 04 2023

Michael Bounces on Jesus: A Heavenly Parable

Michael dies. Michael goes to Heaven and meets Jesus. Michael reality-checks Jesus…
Feb 03 2023

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court Deems Gun Possession More Important Than Family Safety

There is no real doubt that the 5th Circuit’s decision is going to lead to more abusers murdering their wives and girlfriends.
Feb 02 2023

The Ambition of Ron DeSantis: Big Brother, Fahrenheit 451 or Both?

Ron DeSantis has pushed for a curriculum that whitewashes—irony intended—the vast history of oppression of black members of American society throughout our...
Feb 01 2023

A Reality Check on the GOP Promise to Balance the Federal Budget

A quick look back at how we briefly balanced the budget twenty years ago, along with how much has changed, shows that Republicans are unlikely to manage a similar...
Jan 30 2023

Yes, White Supremacy Killed Tyre Nichols

When black officers pulled Tyre Nichols over, they did so as representatives of a faulty apparatus, one that has for decades perpetuated the message that black people...
Jan 28 2023

Old-Timey Yellow Journalism Is Alive and Well at FOX “News”

We generally think of yellow journalism as a revenue driver, with click bait titles, loosely-researched or fully fabricated facts presented as gospel. But the same...
Jan 27 2023

Trump’s Return to Facebook and Twitter Might Be More His Problem Than Ours

Perhaps the more important fact about Trump’s anticipated return to Twitter and Facebook is that he now owns a competing social media platform. The implications...
Jan 22 2023

A Review of Today’s Republican Party: Bring in the Malignant Clowns

The Republican Party’s dubious hallmark is willed stupidity super-glued to shameless hypocrisy: They want to cut a bedrock social programs despite the fact that...
Jan 20 2023

An Open Letter to the Department of Justice: Act Now to Remove Insurrectionists from Congress

The very ability of our government to function on our behalf is being held hostage by insurrectionists in Congress and the ransom is unacceptable. Where is the...
Subscribe for Updates!

Subscribe for Updates!

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This