Three Lessons from the Supreme Court’s Smackdown of Trump’s Attempt to Block Documents

by | Jan 24, 2022 | Quick Facts

Some things can’t be hidden from public view. Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Three Lessons from the Supreme Court’s Smackdown of Trump’s Attempt to Block Documents

by | Jan 24, 2022 | Quick Facts

Some things can’t be hidden from public view. Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Unlike previous presidents, Trump refused to negotiate with Congress over disclosing White House records. Instead, he took his fights with Congress to the courts.

Republished with permission from The Conversation, by Kirsten Carlson, Wayne State University

In a legal blow for Donald Trump, the Supreme Court has cleared the way for presidential records dating from his time in office to be turned over to a House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack.

Trump, through his lawyers, had sought to shield over 800 pages of information from the panel, citing executive privilege, which allows for a president to withhold certain information from public release. But in a 8-1 ruling, the Supreme Court on Jan. 19, 2022, rejected a request to block the documents from being handed to Congress.

The ruling has immediate — and potentially longer-term — consequences. Here are three key takeaways from the court’s decision.

1. Executive Power Has Its Limits

Trump has championed an expansive view of executive power. During his presidency, he refused to provide information to Congress by asserting executive privilege over a dozen times, issued executive orders in the face of congressional opposition, and even sued his personal and business accountants to prevent them from handing personal tax information over to Congress, which had subpoenaed those records.

Unlike previous presidents, Trump refused to negotiate with Congress over disclosing White House records. Instead, he took his fights with Congress to the courts.

Out of office, Trump continues to resist efforts to disclose information about his presidency. He has urged several former White House staffers and advisers to claim executive privilege in response to subpoenas for information related to the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. The Congress has even had to take the extraordinary step of referring former Trump adviser Steve Bannon and former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows to the Department of Justice for criminal contempt proceedings because they have refused to comply with subpoenas.

Federal courts do not like to wade into disputes between the executive branch and Congress, but Trump pushed them to do so.

In its short opinion, the Supreme Court rejected Trump’s expansive view of executive power. The court denied Trump’s request to prevent the National Archives from releasing documents to the committee, stating that his case to shield the records could not prevail “under any of the tests [he] advocated.”

The court added, “Because the court of appeals concluded that President Trump’s claims would have failed even if he were the incumbent, his status as a former president necessarily made no difference in the decision.”

It isn’t the first time that the Supreme Court has had to wade into the issue of Trump’s attempted use of executive power to withhold information from Congress.

In a 2020 ruling in Trump v. Mazars — in which Trump sued his accountants in a bid to prevent their release of tax documents to Congress — the court rejected Trump’s claim of absolute immunity from congressional process and crafted a new analysis to determine when Congress can obtain a president’s personal records.

Similarly, in the latest ruling the Supreme Court appears to be pushing back against Trump’s expansive view of executive power in favor of a more balanced approach.

2. Unanswered Question Over Ex-Presidents and Executive Privilege

Although the justices questioned Trump’s expansive view on executive power, the Supreme Court ruling still preserves the ability of a former president to raise such a claim.

This is consistent with a landmark 1977 decision in which the Supreme Court held that former President Richard Nixon could claim executive privilege in challenging a federal law known as “The Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act.”

That law ensured that government agencies — and, ultimately, the public — could obtain certain documents and tape recordings made during Nixon’s presidency.

The court allowed Nixon to make the executive privilege claim, but it ultimately ruled against him. In upholding the law, the Supreme Court noted that the lack of support for Nixon’s claim by other presidents weakened his case for executive privilege.

The court, in its latest ruling, did not consider the questions of whether and under what conditions a former president may be able to prevail on a claim of executive privilege.

3. The Importance of Congressional Oversight

The Supreme Court’s ruling also reiterated the importance of congressional oversight, and the need for the American people to learn the truth about what happened on Jan. 6, 2021.

By paving the way for the House Select Committee to access hundreds of documents — including visitor and call logs, emails, draft speeches and handwritten notes — the court has seemingly recognized that a healthy, stable democracy depends on people knowing what their government is doing so they can hold elected officials accountable.

As such, the Supreme Court has indicated a willingness to protect a constitutional system that can ensure transparency and accountability by legitimizing legislative branch oversight over the executive.The Conversation


Kirsten Carlson, Associate Professor of Law and Adjunct Associate Professor of Political Science, Wayne State University

The Conversation

The Conversation

The Conversation is a nonprofit, independent news organization dedicated to unlocking the knowledge of experts for the public good. We publish trustworthy and informative articles written by academic experts for the general public and edited by our team of journalists.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Related Articles

May 14 2022

The Facts Surrounding the U.S. Baby Formula Shortage

As Republican fear mongers like Elise Stefanik whip out conspiracy accusations and blame about the baby formula shortage, the real facts from a pediatrician are more...
May 12 2022

Trump Is Under Federal Grand Jury Investigation — Finally

A federal grand jury has issued at least one subpoena, and investigators are seeking interviews in the case of sensitive documents that ended up at the former...
May 12 2022

Tucker Carlson’s Fake Masculinity Crisis Is a Fascist History Lesson

Tucker Carlson is pulling from an old playbook as he stokes anxiety about a masculinity crisis that doesn’t actually exist.
May 11 2022

State Anti-Abortion Laws Are Causing Confusion for Treatment of Miscarriages

In Texas, anti-abortion laws are creating uncertainties that may deter some doctors and other providers from offering optimal miscarriage treatment.
May 07 2022

Healthcare Profiteering: Medical Bills Force a Family to Get Care in Mexico

The Fierro family was trapped in a situation of being “functionally uninsured.” They have insurance, but their healthcare plan is expensive and they don’t have the...
May 02 2022

Private Utility Companies Also Got Into the Pandemic Profiteering Act

A new report details how private utility companies shut off electricity to U.S. households more than 3.5 million times since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, even...
May 01 2022

Pumped Up Inflation: Big Oil Profits Double and Quadruple Amid Ukraine Crisis Excuses

One of the major factors of the current “inflation” is Big Oil intentionally profiteering off the war in Ukraine. Pump prices remain sky high even though no...
white and blue truck on road during daytime
Apr 29 2022

How the Livelihood of America’s Trucking World Got Hijacked

Trucking has been turned into a corporate racket, with CEOs arbitrarily abusing the workers who move their products across town and country.
Apr 28 2022

America’s Frontline Doctors: Anti-Vax Messaging for Profit

Aside from anti-vax disinformation, America’s Frontline Doctors also sells prescriptions for Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, and other COVID-19...
Apr 24 2022

COVID-19: Should You Still Wear a Mask on a Plane, Bus or Train When There’s No Mandate?

Fewer people are wearing masks today in spite of the fact that the COVID-19 pandemic is still going. April 22nd alone saw over 55,000 new infections in the U.S. And...
Subscribe for Updates!

Subscribe for Updates!

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This