Three Lessons from the Supreme Court’s Smackdown of Trump’s Attempt to Block Documents

by | Jan 24, 2022 | Quick Facts

Some things can’t be hidden from public view. Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Three Lessons from the Supreme Court’s Smackdown of Trump’s Attempt to Block Documents

by | Jan 24, 2022 | Quick Facts

Some things can’t be hidden from public view. Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Unlike previous presidents, Trump refused to negotiate with Congress over disclosing White House records. Instead, he took his fights with Congress to the courts.

Republished with permission from The Conversation, by Kirsten Carlson, Wayne State University

In a legal blow for Donald Trump, the Supreme Court has cleared the way for presidential records dating from his time in office to be turned over to a House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack.

Trump, through his lawyers, had sought to shield over 800 pages of information from the panel, citing executive privilege, which allows for a president to withhold certain information from public release. But in a 8-1 ruling, the Supreme Court on Jan. 19, 2022, rejected a request to block the documents from being handed to Congress.

The ruling has immediate — and potentially longer-term — consequences. Here are three key takeaways from the court’s decision.

1. Executive Power Has Its Limits

Trump has championed an expansive view of executive power. During his presidency, he refused to provide information to Congress by asserting executive privilege over a dozen times, issued executive orders in the face of congressional opposition, and even sued his personal and business accountants to prevent them from handing personal tax information over to Congress, which had subpoenaed those records.

Unlike previous presidents, Trump refused to negotiate with Congress over disclosing White House records. Instead, he took his fights with Congress to the courts.

Out of office, Trump continues to resist efforts to disclose information about his presidency. He has urged several former White House staffers and advisers to claim executive privilege in response to subpoenas for information related to the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. The Congress has even had to take the extraordinary step of referring former Trump adviser Steve Bannon and former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows to the Department of Justice for criminal contempt proceedings because they have refused to comply with subpoenas.

Federal courts do not like to wade into disputes between the executive branch and Congress, but Trump pushed them to do so.

In its short opinion, the Supreme Court rejected Trump’s expansive view of executive power. The court denied Trump’s request to prevent the National Archives from releasing documents to the committee, stating that his case to shield the records could not prevail “under any of the tests [he] advocated.”

The court added, “Because the court of appeals concluded that President Trump’s claims would have failed even if he were the incumbent, his status as a former president necessarily made no difference in the decision.”

It isn’t the first time that the Supreme Court has had to wade into the issue of Trump’s attempted use of executive power to withhold information from Congress.

In a 2020 ruling in Trump v. Mazars — in which Trump sued his accountants in a bid to prevent their release of tax documents to Congress — the court rejected Trump’s claim of absolute immunity from congressional process and crafted a new analysis to determine when Congress can obtain a president’s personal records.

Similarly, in the latest ruling the Supreme Court appears to be pushing back against Trump’s expansive view of executive power in favor of a more balanced approach.

2. Unanswered Question Over Ex-Presidents and Executive Privilege

Although the justices questioned Trump’s expansive view on executive power, the Supreme Court ruling still preserves the ability of a former president to raise such a claim.

This is consistent with a landmark 1977 decision in which the Supreme Court held that former President Richard Nixon could claim executive privilege in challenging a federal law known as “The Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act.”

That law ensured that government agencies — and, ultimately, the public — could obtain certain documents and tape recordings made during Nixon’s presidency.

The court allowed Nixon to make the executive privilege claim, but it ultimately ruled against him. In upholding the law, the Supreme Court noted that the lack of support for Nixon’s claim by other presidents weakened his case for executive privilege.

The court, in its latest ruling, did not consider the questions of whether and under what conditions a former president may be able to prevail on a claim of executive privilege.

3. The Importance of Congressional Oversight

The Supreme Court’s ruling also reiterated the importance of congressional oversight, and the need for the American people to learn the truth about what happened on Jan. 6, 2021.

By paving the way for the House Select Committee to access hundreds of documents — including visitor and call logs, emails, draft speeches and handwritten notes — the court has seemingly recognized that a healthy, stable democracy depends on people knowing what their government is doing so they can hold elected officials accountable.

As such, the Supreme Court has indicated a willingness to protect a constitutional system that can ensure transparency and accountability by legitimizing legislative branch oversight over the executive.The Conversation

Kirsten Carlson, Associate Professor of Law and Adjunct Associate Professor of Political Science, Wayne State University

The Conversation

The Conversation

The Conversation is a nonprofit, independent news organization dedicated to unlocking the knowledge of experts for the public good. We publish trustworthy and informative articles written by academic experts for the general public and edited by our team of journalists.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Related Articles

Nov 21 2022

By the Numbers: How the Supreme Court Paved the Way for the GOP House Majority

Recent actions—and inaction—by the right-wing majority of the U.S. Supreme Court paved the way for a Republican House majority.
Nov 14 2022

How Ballot Recounts Work in Colorado

The surprisingly competitive matchup between Boebert and Frisch has become Colorado’s closest congressional race since 2002 and will likely trigger a statutory...
Nov 13 2022

Why Misinformation About COVID Vaccines and Pregnancy Won’t Go Away

Before coronavirus vaccines were even released, a disinformation campaign used a moment of national and personal vulnerability to prey on those who were pregnant or who...
Nov 08 2022

Campaign Contributions: Following the Money in an Election Campaign

Campaign contributions can be a confusing web of super PACs, FEC filings and dark money. That’s why it is useful to know how to see who is paying who and trying to...
assorted-color filling book lot
Nov 06 2022

Examining the Futility of Book Banning

Book banning is an illiberal idea that undermines a long and honorable tradition of making knowledge and ideas widely available, making people free to choose what to...
Nov 01 2022

Making Liars Money: How Google’s Ad Business Funds Disinformation Around the World

The largest-ever analysis of Google’s ad practices on non-English-language websites reveals how the tech giant makes disinformation profitable.
Oct 31 2022

Lula Defeats Fascist Bolsonaro in Brazilian Presidential Runoff

The Workers’ Party candidate, who completed a remarkable political comeback less than three years removed from a prison cell, tweeted one word following his win:...
brown and white concrete pathway between gray concrete buildings during daytime
Oct 27 2022

New Study Finds Republican Policies Are Killing Americans

With the midterm elections less than two weeks away, experts say it’s important for working-age Americans to know whether they are voting for officials who...
Oct 20 2022

UK’s Prime Minister Resigns Amid Economic Turmoil, Chaos in Parliament and a Party in Tatters

In what should be a lesson to conservatives in the US—but probably won’t—Liz Truss resigns after a mere six weeks as Prime Minister, after attempting to invoke a...
Oct 18 2022

Facebook Says Fake Accounts Don’t Violate Community Standards

It appears Facebook is condoning the cloning of accounts and says they do not violate “community standards.” This begs the question: of Facebook’s...
Subscribe for Updates!

Subscribe for Updates!

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This