Time to Use 14th Amendment Against Lawmakers Who Betrayed Their Oaths on January 6

by | Sep 22, 2022 | Human Rights & Justice

U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) sports a mask emblazoned with the lie that former President Donald Trump "won" the 2020 presidential election. (Photo: Erin Scott/AFP via Getty Images)

Time to Use 14th Amendment Against Lawmakers Who Betrayed Their Oaths on January 6

by | Sep 22, 2022 | Human Rights & Justice

U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) sports a mask emblazoned with the lie that former President Donald Trump "won" the 2020 presidential election. (Photo: Erin Scott/AFP via Getty Images)
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington argues there some current and future members of Congress should be disqualified from holding office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

Citing a recent court ruling, a government watchdog group on Wednesday urged members of Congress to remove and bar from office anyone “who betrayed their constitutional oaths by engaging in the January 6 insurrection.”

The letter from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) to U.S. lawmakers follows a New Mexico court ruling earlier this month that the 2021 attack at the U.S. Capitol was an insurrection, and ordering Otero County Commissioner Couy Griffin to step down.

CREW had filed a suit arguing that Griffin’s actions before and on January 6, 2021 amounted to engaging in an insurrection, and thus, under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, he should be disqualified from holding public office.

Section 3 prohibits anyone who, having taken an oath to support the U.S. Constitution, engages in “insurrection or rebellion” or provides “aid or comfort to the enemies” of the United States from holding any civil or military office at the state or federal level.

CREW’s letter notes that the ruling against Griffin—who joined the mob of then-President Donald Trump’s supporters that breached multiple security barriers at the Capitol—explains “that an insurrection need not ‘rise to the level of trying to overthrow the government.’ Rather, an insurrection is an assemblage of people acting through force, violence, and intimidation by numbers to prevent the federal government from performing a constitutional function—a definition that indisputably applies to the January 6 attack.”

“The ruling also cites Reconstruction-era case law establishing that a person can be disqualified under the 14th Amendment even if they have not been convicted of a crime and even if they did not engage in violence,” the letter continues, arguing that the court’s “factual findings are instructive” for others who in any qualifying way supported the January 6 insurrection.

“Although the court’s decision sets a high bar for disqualification, we believe there are other current and former office holders throughout the country who, under the court’s standard, should be disqualified from office,” asserted CREW, without naming them. “The obligation to exclude and disqualify these individuals will be borne by many federal and state officials throughout our country, but Congress has a particularly important role to play.”

Noting the long history of Congress enforcing the disqualification clause, the watchdog warned that “in the unprecedented context of the January 6 insurrection—an event that marked the first-ever presidential transition marred by violence—failing to enforce the Constitution against those who sought to subvert a free and fair presidential election imperils the very foundations of American democracy.”

CREW’s call for action comes amid a flurry of warnings about the danger of Trump—who’s expected to run for president again in 2024—and his Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement leading up to the November midterm elections.

“Donald Trump is a fascist. Period,” Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) declared this week. “We have to reject this dangerous movement across the country in November—our democracy depends on it.”

According to a recent FiveThirtyEight analysis, 195 GOP candidates on the ballot in November for the U.S. House and Senate as well as governor, secretary of state, and attorney general support Trump’s “Big Lie” that Democrats stole the 2020 presidential election. Another 61 candidates doubt the results, and 115 have refused to clarify their position.

Shortly after the MAGA mob was cleared from the Capitol last year, 147 Republicans in Congress formally objected to the presidential election results. The congressional panel investigating the attack has revealed that multiple GOP lawmakers sought preemptive pardons from Trump related to their efforts to overturn President Joe Biden’s victory.

While there is no evidence that Trump granted any such requests at the time, the twice-impeached former president said earlier this month that if reelected in two years, he would “look very, very favorably” at pardons for insurrectionists.

However, in terms of holding public office, CREW’s new letter highlights that “a disqualification under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment cannot be cured through a presidential pardon and can only be removed by a two-thirds vote of Congress.”

Republished with permission from Common Dreams, by Jessica Corbett

<a href="http://commondreams.org" target="_blank">Common Dreams</a>

Common Dreams

Common Dreams has been providing breaking news & views for the progressive community since 1997. They are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

1 Comment

  1. Bruce Wilson

    I fully agree with the conclusion that these traitors must not hold governmental offices; now or at any future time in their lives

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Related Articles

Feb 03 2023

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court Deems Gun Possession More Important Than Family Safety

There is no real doubt that the 5th Circuit’s decision is going to lead to more abusers murdering their wives and girlfriends.
Attendees hold signs as they listen to speakers during a rally calling for an end to corporate money in politics and to mark the fifth anniversary of the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision on January 21, 2015 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Jan 20 2023

House Democrats Introduce Constitutional Amendment to Overturn Citizens United

The Citizens United decision allowed special interest groups and corporations to create super PACs, to accept unlimited donations—including from “dark money...
Jan 14 2023

California AG Sues Big Pharma Drugmakers Over Insulin Price Gouging

California follows other states in going after insulin companies and pharmaceutical middlemen, but California is taking an aggressive approach by charging the companies...
Dec 26 2022

The Christmas Cruelty of Greg Abbott

Three buses coming from Texas dropped off about 140 recent migrants—including babies and young children—near VP Harris’ residence in Washington, D.C., in historically...
Dec 24 2022

How the January 6th Committee Tackled an Unprecedented Attack With a Time-Tested Inquiry

Despite the unprecedented action by the January 6th committee of the criminal referral of the ex-president for a variety of charges, Congressional committees have a...
Dec 20 2022

A Constitutional Law Expert Explains What the Criminal Referral of Trump Means

A professor of constitutional law helps explain why the recommended charges against Trump are important, where they fall short—and what could come next.
Dec 19 2022

Students With Disabilities—The Illinois School That Routinely Has Students Arrested

An Illinois school for students with disabilities has routinely used the police to handle discipline, resulting in the highest arrest rate of any district in the...
Dec 18 2022

The Danger of the Republican’s Bogus ‘Independent State Legislatures’ Theory

Republicans support the ‘Independent State Legislatures’ theory because they’ve given up on democracy. They seek to make it harder for people to vote and box them into...
Dec 15 2022

What America Can Learn About Medical Debt From Germany’s Coal Miners

Germany’s limits on how much patients pay out-of-pocket at the doctor’s office have been critical to ensuring people get needed care, especially in a mining region...
Dec 10 2022

The Details Behind Brittney Griner’s Long Road Home

Outside of the public eye, pleas, letters and negotiations were in action for months to gain the release of Brittney Griner from her imprisonment in Russia.
Subscribe for Updates!

Subscribe for Updates!

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This