The Supreme Prejudice of the Supreme Court’s Dobbs “Decision”

by | Jul 9, 2022 | Opinions & Commentary, Human Rights & Justice

The inside of the United States Supreme Court. Photo: Phil Roeder, Wiki Commons

The Supreme Prejudice of the Supreme Court’s Dobbs “Decision”

by | Jul 9, 2022 | Opinions & Commentary, Human Rights & Justice

The inside of the United States Supreme Court. Photo: Phil Roeder, Wiki Commons
Instead of practicing justice, the Supreme Court has descended to the practice of prejudice—something we have all trusted that it would never do.

There really wasn’t a Supreme Court “Decision.”

I believe this is the definition of judge that is intended to be used by a Supreme Court Justice, indeed, any Judge at any level.
verb: “to form an opinion about through careful weighing of evidence and testing of premises.”

I think prejudge is what was used by the majority to make the recent “decision”: verb: “to judge before hearing or before full and sufficient examination.”

Prejudging is not a “decision,” it is a preconceived notion that is not put forward in evidence or premise. It is never “tested” in any way. It is what Judges spend a great deal of time instructing juries NOT to use. I would say, more than half of what a Judge tells a jury is not to prejudge, to set YOUR PERSONAL VIEWS ASIDE. Use only the law and evidence presented in court.

Essentially, the Supreme Court held itself to a lower standard than the lowest courts hold citizens to who are called to do jury duty.

Prejudge is the base of the word prejudice.

The prejudice in this case was religious doctrine which is, if one believes in it, inviolate. It cannot be judged, it can only be followed, ignored or refuted. The premise that existed and was not examined in this case has to do with the concept, belief in or existence of souls and when they “ensoul” a body.

Regardless of your beliefs—and I personally do believe in this idea though not in the Christian way—it has no place in a court of any kind.

Those who stand for the United States of America should be aware that that is how the courts are supposed to operate—without prejudice.

Peter Kjenaas

Peter Kjenaas

Peter Kjenaas is an author, screenwriter, theater director, producer, chef, AirBnB host, parent and caregiver extraordinaire. And now he adds travel writer to his resumé as he sets off across the country in a 1971 VW camper bus. But first and foremost he is a caring and productive human who has graciously allowed us to post some of his writings to this site. See his latest book at, and his travel adventures at Riders on the Storm Bus.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Related Articles

Feb 03 2023

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court Deems Gun Possession More Important Than Family Safety

There is no real doubt that the 5th Circuit’s decision is going to lead to more abusers murdering their wives and girlfriends.
Feb 02 2023

The Ambition of Ron DeSantis: Big Brother, Fahrenheit 451 or Both?

Ron DeSantis has pushed for a curriculum that whitewashes—irony intended—the vast history of oppression of black members of American society throughout our...
Feb 01 2023

A Reality Check on the GOP Promise to Balance the Federal Budget

A quick look back at how we briefly balanced the budget twenty years ago, along with how much has changed, shows that Republicans are unlikely to manage a similar...
Jan 30 2023

Yes, White Supremacy Killed Tyre Nichols

When black officers pulled Tyre Nichols over, they did so as representatives of a faulty apparatus, one that has for decades perpetuated the message that black people...
Jan 28 2023

Old-Timey Yellow Journalism Is Alive and Well at FOX “News”

We generally think of yellow journalism as a revenue driver, with click bait titles, loosely-researched or fully fabricated facts presented as gospel. But the same...
Jan 27 2023

Trump’s Return to Facebook and Twitter Might Be More His Problem Than Ours

Perhaps the more important fact about Trump’s anticipated return to Twitter and Facebook is that he now owns a competing social media platform. The implications...
Jan 22 2023

A Review of Today’s Republican Party: Bring in the Malignant Clowns

The Republican Party’s dubious hallmark is willed stupidity super-glued to shameless hypocrisy: They want to cut a bedrock social programs despite the fact that...
Jan 20 2023

An Open Letter to the Department of Justice: Act Now to Remove Insurrectionists from Congress

The very ability of our government to function on our behalf is being held hostage by insurrectionists in Congress and the ransom is unacceptable. Where is the...
Attendees hold signs as they listen to speakers during a rally calling for an end to corporate money in politics and to mark the fifth anniversary of the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision on January 21, 2015 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Jan 20 2023

House Democrats Introduce Constitutional Amendment to Overturn Citizens United

The Citizens United decision allowed special interest groups and corporations to create super PACs, to accept unlimited donations—including from “dark money...
Jan 15 2023

Transfer of Power: The Constitutional Crisis of 1801

As a country, we don’t remember what happened 222 years ago, because we tend not to remember history. But also because that political storm “rolled harmlessly away.”...
Subscribe for Updates!

Subscribe for Updates!

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This